Scientific American reports on Science 2.0, the use of social media among scientists doing active research. The article is actually a draft slated for publication in
several months - and you are invited to help edit the final version. It's a good article, reporting all points of view regarding open source science, and I'd encourage you to read it. But I wanted to share this quote about how science, indeed, how discovery, proceeds.
The technologies of Web 2.0 open up a much richer dialog, says Bill
Hooker, a postdoctoral cancer researcher at the Shriners Hospital for
Children in Portland, Ore., and the author of a three-part survey of
open-science efforts in the group blog, 3 Quarks Daily. 'To me, opening
up my lab notebook means giving people a window into what I'm doing
every day. That's an immense leap forward in clarity. In a paper, I can
see what you've done. But I don't know how many things you tried that
didn’t work. It's those little details that become clear with open
notebook, but are obscured by every other communication mechanism we
have. It makes science more efficient.' That jump in efficiency, in
turn, could have huge payoffs for society, in everything from faster
drug development to greater national competitiveness (emphasis supplied).
A quick search of the Public Library of Science On-Line Edition (PLOS One), which was referenced in the article, also suggested another significant reason for doing science out in the open. Currently, the ties between science and science funding are not adequately reported.
Wayne
Recent Comments